Comorbid Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury: Screening Validity and Effect on Outcomes
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a self-report measure of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to assess the potential effect of TBI on acute and postacute outcomes.

Design

Incident TBI as determined by self-report was compared with systematic medical records review by physicians blinded to self-reported TBI.

Setting

Inpatient rehabilitation unit.

Participants

From 155 consecutive admissions, participants (N=105; 73% men; mean age, 45.9y; 73% white; 58% with tetraplegia) who met inclusion criteria and were admitted on the day of injury were recruited and assessed.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Step 2 of the Traumatic Brain Injury-4 (TBI-4) interview was used to estimate the presence and severity of TBI.

Results

Estimated incidence of TBI was 33% by chart review and 60% based on Step 2 of the TBI-4. Ninety-one percent of those with TBI based on chart review sustained mild injuries. At the optimal cutoff of “possible TBI,” the TBI-4 had a sensitivity of 83% (95% confidence interval, 66%–93%), a specificity of 51% (95% confidence interval, 39%–64%), and a Youden Index of 0.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.2–0.5). Compared with those without TBI, those with chart review–determined TBI had nonsignificant trends toward a longer acute care length of stay and a higher functional status at rehabilitation discharge, but equivalent 1-year outcomes.

Conclusions

Step 2 of theTBI-4 did not meet Youden's criteria (≥0.8) for good diagnostic accuracy in the context of recent SCI. Comorbid TBIs were almost exclusively mild and not associated with poorer outcomes 1 year after SCI.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700