Assessment of possible impacts of climate change on the hydrological regimes of different regions in China

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Alfredo Reder^a ; ^b ; ^{alfredo.reder@cmcc.it} ; Guido Rianna^a ; Renata Vezzoli^a ; Paola Mercogliano^a ; ^c
• 关键词：Water balance models ; Model comparison ; Bias correction ; Hydrological impacts ; Soil parameters ; China
• 刊名：Advances in Climate Change Research
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：September 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：7
• 期：3
• 页码：169-184
• 全文大小：3751 K
• 卷排序：7

文摘

The aim of this work is to investigate the soil water budget across China by means of hydrological modeling under current and future climate conditions and to evaluate the sensitivity to soil parameters. For this purpose, observed precipitation and temperature data (1981–2010) and climate simulations (2021–2050, 2071–2100) at high resolution (about 14 km) on a large part of China are used as weather forcing. The simulated weather forcing has been bias corrected by means of the distribution derived quantile mapping method to eliminate the effects of systematic biases in current climate modeling on water cycle components. As hydrological models, two 1D models are tested: TERRA-ML and HELP. Concerning soil properties, two datasets, provided respectively by Food and Agriculture Organization and U.S. Department of Agriculture, are separately tested. The combination of two hydrological models, two soil parameter datasets and three weather forcing inputs (observations, raw and bias corrected climate simulations) results in five different simulation chains.The study highlights how the choice of some approaches or soil parameterizations can affect the results both in absolute and in relative terms and how these differences could be highly related to weather forcing in inputs or investigated soil. The analyses point out a decrease in average water content in the shallower part of the soil with different extents according to climate zone, concentration scenario and soil/cover features. Moreover, the projected increase in temperature and then in evapotranspirative demand do not ever result in higher actual evapotranspiration values, due to the concurrent variations in precipitation patterns.