Transrectal ultrasound for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervix cancer - An alternative to MRI for target definition?

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Maximilian P. Schmid^a ; ^{maximilian.schmid@akhwien.at" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Nicole Nesvacil^a ; Richard Pö ; tter^a ; ^b ; Gernot Kronreif^c ; Christian Kirisits^a ; ^b
• 关键词：Cervix cancer ; Radiotherapy ; Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy ; MRI ; Transrectal ultrasound
• 刊名：Radiotherapy and Oncology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：September 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：120
• 期：3
• 页码：467-472
• 全文大小：928 K

文摘

To compare the maximum high risk clinical target volume (CTV_HR) dimensions and image quality between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and computed tomography (CT) in image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Material and methods

All patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiochemotherapy and IGABT between 09/2012-05/2013 were included in this study. T2-weighted MRI (1.5 tesla), TRUS and CT were performed before (MRI_preBT, TRUS_preBT) and/or after (MRI_BT, TRUS_BT and CT_BT) insertion of the applicator. 3D TRUS image acquisition was done with a customized US stepper device and software. The HR CTV was defined on 3D image sequences acquired with different imaging modalities by one blinded observer, in accordance to the GEC-ESTRO recommendations for MRI-based target volume delineation, as the complete cervical mass including the tumour, any suspicious areas of parametrial involvement and the normal cervical stroma. Maximum HR CTV width and thickness were measured on transversal planes. Image quality was classified using the following scoring system: Grade 0: not depicted, Grade 1: inability to discriminate, margin not recognizable, Grade 2: fair discrimination, margin indistinct, Grade 3: excellent discrimination, margin distinct. Descriptive statistics, mean differences between the groups, with MRI_BT as reference, and a paired t-test were calculated.

Results

Images from 19 patients (FIGO IB: 3, IIB: 9, IIIB: 5, IVB: 2) were available for analysis. The mean difference in maximum HR CTV width of TRUS_BT, TRUS_preBT, MRI_preBT, CT_BT to MRI_BT was 0.0 mm ± 4.7 (n.s.), −1.1 mm ± 5.6 (n.s.), 0.7 mm ± 6.4 (n.s.) and 13.8 mm ± 6.7 (p < 0.001). The mean difference in maximum HR CTV thickness of TRUS_BT, TRUS_preBT, MRI_preBT, CT_BT to MRI_BT was -3.4 mm ± 5.9 (p = 0.037), −3.4 mm ± 4.2 (p < 0.001), 2.0 mm ± 6.1 (n.s.) and 13.9 mm ± 6.3 (p < 0.001). Mean scores of image quality of the target volume was 2.9 for TRUS_preBT, 2.3 for TRUS_BT, 2.9 for MRI_preBT, 2.7 for MRI_BT and 2.1 for CT_BT.

Conclusion

For the assessment of the HR CTV in IGABT of cervical cancer, TRUS is within the intraobserver variability of MRI. TRUS is superior to CT as it yields systematically smaller deviations from MRI, with good to excellent image quality. Small differences of TRUS HR CTV thickness are likely related to differences in image slice orientation and compression of the cervix by the TRUS probe before insertion of the brachytherapy applicator.