Mechanical comparison of iliosacral reconstruction techniques after sarcoma resection
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Craig R. Louera ; louerc@wudosis.wustl.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Nader A. Nassifb ; c ; nnassif@newportortho.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Michael D. Brodta ; brodtm@wudosis.wustl.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Daniel J. Leiba ; leibd@wudosis.wustl.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Matthew J. Silvaa ; silvam@wudosis.wustl.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Douglas J. McDonalda ; mcdonaldd@wudosis.wustl.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author
- 关键词：Pelvis ; Sarcoma ; Iliosacral reconstruction ; Spinal instrumentation ; Oncology ; Mechanics
- 刊名：Clinical Biomechanics
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：October 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：38
- 期：Complete
- 页码：35-41
- 全文大小：1165 K
文摘
- •
Plate-and-screw constructs performed better than spinal instrumentation constructs.
- •
A single point-of-fixation in each segment predisposes to rotational displacement.
- •
Increased motion through the defect resulted in failure at the pubic symphysis.
- •
Implant-bone interface, not implant strength, chiefly defines construct stability.
- •
Reconstructive techniques should prioritize quality sacral and iliac fixation.