High inter-rater reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of Constant score in patients with clavicle fractures

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ilija Ban ; MD^a ; ^{Ilija.ban@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Anders Troelsen ; DMSc^a ; Morten Tange Kristensen ; PhD^b
• 关键词：Basic Science Study ; Validation of Outcomes Instruments or Classification Systems
• 刊名：Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：25
• 期：10
• 页码：1577-1582
• 全文大小：215 K

文摘

The Constant score (CS) has been the primary endpoint in most studies on clavicle fractures. However, the CS was not developed to assess patients with clavicle fractures. Our aim was to examine inter-rater reliability and agreement of the CS in patients with clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to estimate the correlation between the CS and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the internal consistency of the 2 scores.

Methods

On the basis of sample sizing, 36 patients (31 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 41.3 years) with clavicle fractures underwent standardized CS assessment at a mean of 6.8 weeks (SD, 1.0 weeks) after injury. Reliability and agreement of the CS were determined by 2 raters. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, Cronbach α coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient were estimated.

Results

Inter-rater reliability of the total CS was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97), with no systematic difference between the 2 raters (P = .75). The standard error of measurement (measurement error at the group level) was 4.9, whereas the minimal detectable change (smallest change needed to indicate a real change for an individual) was 13.6 CS points. The internal consistency of the 10 CS items was good, with a Cronbach α of .85, and we found a strong correlation (r = −0.92) between the CS and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.

Conclusions

The CS was found to be reliable for assessing patients with clavicle fractures, especially at the group level. With high inter-rater reliability and agreement, in addition to good internal consistency, the standardized CS used in this study can be used for comparison of results from different settings.