Uptake and Utilization of Practice Guidelines in Hospitals in the United States: the Case of Routine Episiotomy

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Katy B. Kozhimannil ; PhD ; MPA ; ^kbk@umn.eduAuthor Vitae ; Pinar Karaca-Mandic ; PhDAuthor Vitae ; Cori J. Blauer-Peterson ; MPHAuthor Vitae ; Neel T. Shah ; MD ; MPPAuthor Vitae ; Jonathan M. Snowden ; PhDAuthor Vitae
• 刊名：The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：43
• 期：1
• 页码：41-48
• 全文大小：251 K
• 卷排序：43

文摘

The gap between publishing and implementing guidelines differs based on practice setting, including hospital geography and teaching status. On March 31, 2006, a Practice Bulletin published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended against the routine use of episiotomy and urged clinicians to make judicious decisions to restrict the use of the procedure.ObjectiveThis study investigated changes in trends of episiotomy use before and after the ACOG Practice Guideline was issued in 2006, focusing on differences by hospital geographic location (rural/urban) and teaching status.MethodsIn a retrospective analysis of discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS)—a 20% sample of US hospitals—5,779,781 hospital-based births from 2002 to 2011 (weighted N = 28,067,939) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to measure odds of episiotomy and trends in episiotomy use in vaginal deliveries.ResultsThe overall episiotomy rate decreased from 20.3% in 2002 to 9.4% in 2011. Across all settings, a comparatively larger decline in episiotomy rates preceded the issuance of the ACOG Practice Guideline (34.0% decline), rather than following it (23.9% decline). The episiotomy rate discrepancies between rural, urban teaching, and urban nonteaching hospitals remained steady prior to the guideline's release; however, differences between urban nonteaching and urban teaching hospitals narrowed between 2007 and 2011 after the guideline was issued.ConclusionTeaching status was a strong predictor of odds of episiotomy, with urban nonteaching hospitals having the highest rates of noncompliance with evidence-based practice. Issuance of clinical guidelines precipitated a narrowing of this discrepancy.