Diagnostic Performance of High-Definition Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Performed With Multiple Radiation Dose Reduction Strategies

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bobak Heydari ; MD^a ; Jonathon Leipsic ; MD^a ; G.B. John Mancini ; MD^a ; ^b ; James K. Min ; MD^c ; ^d ; Troy LaBounty ; MD^d ; C. Taylor ; MD^a ; Gabriela V. Cohen Freue ; PhD^d ; Brett Heilbron ; MD^a ; ^{bheilbron@gmail.com}
• 刊名：Canadian Journal of Cardiology
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：September-October 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：27
• 期：5
• 页码：606-612
• 全文大小：1036 K

文摘

Background

Numerous radiation dose reduction measures have been proposed for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Although these techniques allow for imaging with reduced radiation, it is unknown whether diagnostic performance is maintained. A new high-definition CCTA (HD-CCTA) allows higher spatial resolution, reduced image noise, and lower radiation doses.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of HD-CCTA, in combination with multiple radiation dose reduction strategies, for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Methods

Consecutive patients (N = 43, aged 60 ¡À 10 years, 83 % male) with chest pain and referred for quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) underwent HD-CCTA with radiation dose reduction measures, including prospective electrocardiographic triggering, reduction of additional tube on-time, and minimization of tube voltage and current. Intraluminal diameter stenosis ?50 % was considered significant. QCA served as the reference standard. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.

Results

All scans demonstrated diagnostic image quality, with 99 % (543/548) of included coronary segments interpretable by HD-CCTA. Median effective radiation dose was 2.8 mSv (interquartile range, 1.3-3.9). The AUC for the per-patient assessment for stenosis ?50 % was 0.90 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.96), with sensitivity of 95 % (95 % CI, 85 % -100 % ), specificity of 79 % (95 % CI, 63 % -95 % ), positive predictive value of 78 % (95 % CI, 61 % -95 % ), and negative predictive value of 95 % (95 % CI, 85 % -100 % ).

Conclusions

Compared with QCA, HD-CCTA with multiple dose reduction measures resulted in low radiation doses and high diagnostic accuracy to detect and exclude obstructive coronary artery disease.