The content of the 13 existing issues of the JCCP (1996-2007) were assessed. Articles were categorized by type, and information concerning author affiliation, academic/professional background and gender were tabulated. A second-level analysis applied specific criteria checklists to applicable articles to determine the quality rating of each paper.
There were 72 articles included in the analysis, of which 46 % were case reports, 17 % editorials, 13 % case series, 10 % narrative literature reviews, 10 % commentaries, 4 % “other,” and 1 % cross-sectional studies. Seventy-five percent of the authors were “private practitioners.” A certification in chiropractic pediatrics was held by 43 % of the authors; 65 % of the authors were females, and 83 % of the articles had a single author. After applying the checklist to specific articles, 13 articles (18 % ) scored 40 % or better (range of 40 % -67 % ), whereas 59 articles (82 % ) scored less than 40 % .
The findings of this analysis suggest there is room for improvement in article type and publication quality of papers in the JCCP.