Many current organic arable agriculture syste
ms are challenged by a dependency on i
mported livestock
manure fro
m conventional agriculture. At the sa
me ti
me organic agriculture ai
ms at being cli
mate friendly. A life cycle assess
ment is used in this paper to co
mpare the carbon footprints of different organic arable crop rotations with different sources of N supply. Data fro
m long-ter
m field experi
ments at three different locations in Den
mark were used to analyse three different organic cropping syste
ms (鈥楽lurry鈥? 鈥楤iogas鈥?and 鈥楳ulching鈥?, one conventional cropping syste
m (鈥楥onventional鈥? and a 鈥淣o input鈥?syste
m as reference syste
ms. The 鈥楽lurry鈥?and 鈥楥onventional鈥?rotations received slurry and
mineral fertilizer, respectively, whereas the 鈥楴o input鈥?was unfertilized. The 鈥楳ulching鈥?and 鈥楤iogas鈥?rotations had one year of grass-clover instead of a faba bean crop. The grass-clover bio
mass was incorporated in the soil in the 鈥楳ulching鈥?rotation and re
moved and used for biogas production in the 鈥楤iogas鈥?rotation (and residues fro
m biogas production were si
mulated to be returned to the field).
A method was suggested for allocating effects of fertility building crops in life cycle assessments. The results showed significantly lower carbon footprint of the crops from the 鈥楤iogas鈥?rotation (assuming that biogas replaces fossil gas) whereas the remaining crop rotations had comparable carbon footprints per kg cash crop. The study showed considerable contributions caused by the green manure crop (grass-clover) and highlights the importance of analysing the whole crop rotation and including soil carbon changes when estimating carbon footprints of organic crops especially where green manure crops are included.