Early and Long-Term Results of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting: The LE MANS (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) Registry

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Pawel E. Buszman ; Piotr P. Buszman ; R. Stefan Kiesz ; Andrzej Bochenek ; Blazej Trela ; Magda Konkolewska ; David Wallace-Bradley ; Mirosł ; aw Wilczyń ; ski ; Iwona Banasiewicz-Szkró ; bka ; Ewa Peszek-Przybyla ; Marek Krol ; Marek Kondys ; Krzysztof Milewski ; Szymon Wiernek ; Marcin Dę ; biń
• 关键词：unprotected left main coronary artery disease ; percutaneous coronary intervention ; drug-eluting stent ; bare-metal stent
• 刊名：Journal of the American College of Cardiology
• 出版年：2009
• 出版时间：13 October 2009
• 年：2009
• 卷：54
• 期：16
• 页码：1500-1511
• 全文大小：474 K

文摘

Objectives

The aim of the study was to evaluate early and late outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA) and to compare bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) subgroups.

Background

PCI is an increasingly utilized method of revascularization in patients with ULMCA.

Methods

This multicenter prospective registry included 252 patients after ULMCA stenting enrolled between March 1997 and February 2008. Non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 58 % of patients; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cases were excluded. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 36.2 % of patients.

Results

Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) occurred in 12 (4.8 % ) patients during the 30-day period, which included 4 (1.5 % ) deaths. After 12 months there were 17 (12.1 % ) angiographically confirmed cases of restenosis. During long-term follow-up (1 to 11 years, mean 3.8 years) there were 64 (25.4 % ) MACCE and 35 (13.9 % ) deaths. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 78.1 % and 68.9 % , respectively. Despite differences in demographical and clinical data in favor of BMS patients, unmatched analysis showed a significantly lower MACCE rate in DES patients (25.9 % vs. 14.9 % , p = 0.039). This difference was strengthened after propensity score matching. The DES lowered both mortality and MACCE for distal ULMCA lesions when compared with BMS. Ejection fraction <50 % was the only independent risk factor influencing long-term survival.

Conclusions

Stenting of ULMCA is feasible and offers good long-term outcome. Implantation of DES for ULMCA decreased the risk of long-term MACCE, and particularly improved survival in patients with distal ULMCA disease.