Translation and factor analysis of structural models of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Serbian pregnant and postpartum women - Web-based study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marina Odalovic^a ; ^{mpetric@pharmacy.bg.ac.rs" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Ivana Tadic^a ; Dragana Lakic^a ; Hedvig Nordeng^b ; ^c ; Angela Lupattelli^b ; Ljiljana Tasic^a
• 关键词：Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ; Pregnancy ; Postpartum period ; Factor analysis ; Serbia
• 刊名：Women and Birth
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：September 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：28
• 期：3
• 页码：e31-e35
• 全文大小：289 K

文摘

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is well accepted for detecting symptoms of postnatal depression. The aim of this study was to examine psychometric properties and to evaluate structural models of the Serbian translation of EPDS in pregnant and postpartum women.

Methods

The original English version of the EPDS was translated into Serbian, and checked by means of back-translation. Data were collected via an anonymous online questionnaire posted on a Serbian website devoted to pregnancy topics. The study sample included 201 women (76 pregnant, 125 postpartum). The internal consistency of the scale was measured by Cronbach's 伪 coefficient. Principal component analysis was used to determine scale dimensions while confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate model fit.

Findings

Cronbach 伪 coefficient was 0.84 and 0.83 in pregnant and postpartum women, respectively, which indicated good internal consistency of the Serbian EPDS. Three dimensions of the scale were revealed in both groups of women. Goodness of fit indices described good and excellent model in pregnant and postpartum women, respectively. High level of depression symptoms (score ≥13) was recorded in 27.6% and 24.8% (p > 0.05) of pregnant and postpartum women, respectively. Moderate level of depression symptoms (score 10–12) was recorded in 21.1% and 16.8% (p > 0.05) of pregnant and postpartum women, respectively.

Conclusion

The Serbian translation of the EPDS showed good consistency and good model characteristics in pregnant and postpartum women. However, cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity of the scale should be determined in the further studies with more representative samples of women.