The Ask-Advise-Connect Approach for Smokers in a Safety Net Healthcare System: A Group-Randomized Trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jennifer Irvin Vidrine ; Sanjay Shete ; Yisheng Li ; Yumei Cao ; Margo Hilliard Alford ; RN Michelle Galindo-Talton ; Vance Rabius ; Barry Sharp ; Penny Harmonson ; Susan M. Zbikowski ; Lyndsay Miles ; David W. Wetter
• 刊名：American Journal of Preventive Medicine
• 出版年：December, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：45
• 期：6
• 页码：737-741
• 全文大小：203 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

Because smoking has a profound impact on socioeconomic disparities in illness and death, it is crucial that vulnerable populations of smokers be targeted with treatment. The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that all patients be asked about their smoking at every visit and that smokers be given brief advice to quit and referred to treatment.

Purpose

Initiatives to facilitate these practices include the 5A鈥檚 (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) and Ask-Advise-Refer (AAR). Unfortunately, primary care referrals are low, and most smokers referred fail to enroll. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) approach to linking smokers with treatment in a large, safety net public healthcare system.

Design

The study design was a pair-matched group-randomized trial with two treatment arms.

Setting/participants

Ten safety net clinics in Houston TX.

Intervention

Clinics were randomized to AAC (n=5; intervention) or AAR (n=5; control). Licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) were trained to assess and record the smoking status of all patients at all visits in the electronic health record. Smokers were given brief advice to quit. In AAC, the names and phone numbers of smokers who agreed to be connected were sent electronically to the Texas quitline daily, and patients were proactively called by the quitline within 48 hours. In AAR, smokers were offered a quitline referral card and encouraged to call on their own. Data were collected between June 2010 and March 2012 and analyzed in 2012.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was impact, defined here as the proportion of identified smokers that enrolled in treatment.

Results

The impact (proportion of identified smokers who enrolled in treatment) of AAC (14.7%) was significantly greater than the impact of AAR (0.5%), t(4)=14.61, p=0.0001, OR=32.10 (95% CI=16.60, 62.06).

Conclusions

The AAC approach to aiding smoking cessation has tremendous potential to reduce tobacco-related health disparities.

Trial registration

This study is registered at ISRCTN78799157.