Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

Many case series have been published on treatments of varicose veins, but comparative randomized controlled trials remain sparse.

Objective

To compare the anatomic success rate, frequency of major complications, and quality-of-life improvement of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and conventional surgery (CS), after 1-year follow-up.

Methods

A total of 240 consecutive patients with primary symptomatic great saphenous vein reflux were randomized to EVLA, UGFS, or CS, consisting of high ligation and short stripping. Primary outcome was anatomic success defined as obliteration or absence of the treated vein on ultrasound examination after 1 year. Secondary outcomes were complications, improvement of the ¡°C¡± class of the CEAP classification, and improvement of disease-specific (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire) and general (EuroQol 5) quality-of-life scores.

Results

More than 80 % of the study population was classified as C2 or C3 venous disease. After 1 year, the anatomic success rate was highest after EVLA (88.5 % ), followed by CS (88.2 % ) and UGFS (72.2 % ) (P?< .001). The complication rate was low and comparable between treatment groups. All groups showed significant (P?< .001) improvement of EuroQol 5 and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire scores after therapy; 84.3 % of all treated patients showed an improvement of the ¡°C¡± of the CEAP classification.

Conclusions

After 1-year follow-up, EVLA is as effective as CS and superior to UGFS according to occlusion on ultrasound duplex. Quality of life improves after treatment in all groups significantly.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700