Can a school-based hand hygiene program reduce asthma exacerbations among elementary school children?

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Lynn B. Gerald ; MSPH ; PhD^a ; ^{lgerald@email.arizona.edu} ; Joe K. Gerald ; MD ; PhD^b ; Bin Zhang ; PhD^c ; Leslie A. McClure ; PhD^d ; William C. Bailey ; MD^e ; Kathy F. Harrington ; MPH ; PhD^e
• 关键词：Asthma ; schools ; children ; hand hygiene ; hand sanitizer
• 刊名：Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：December, 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：130
• 期：6
• 页码：1317-1324
• 全文大小：350 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

ass=""h4"">Background

Viral upper respiratory tract infections have been implicated as a major cause of asthma exacerbations among school-aged children. Regular hand washing is the most effective method to prevent the spread of viral respiratory tract infections, but effective hand-washing practices are difficult to establish in schools.

ass=""h4"">Objectives

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether a standardized regimen of hand washing plus alcohol-based hand sanitizer could reduce asthma exacerbations more than schools¡¯ usual hand hygiene practices.

ass=""h4"">Methods

This was a 2-year, community-based, randomized controlled crossover trial. Schools were randomized to usual care and then intervention (sequence 1) or intervention and then usual care (sequence 2). Intervention schools were provided with alcohol-based hand sanitizer, hand soap, and hand hygiene education. The primary outcome was the proportion of students experiencing an asthma exacerbation each month. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the difference in the marginal rate of exacerbations between sequences while controlling for individual demographic factors and the correlation within each student and between students within each school.

ass=""h4"">Results

Five hundred twenty-seven students with asthma were enrolled among 31 schools. The hand hygiene intervention did not reduce the number of asthma exacerbations compared with the schools¡¯ usual hand hygiene practices (P?=?.132). There was a strong temporal trend because both sequences experienced fewer exacerbations during year 2 compared with year 1 (P?<?.001).

ass=""h4"">Conclusions

Although the intervention was not found to be effective, the results were confounded by the H1N1 influenza pandemic that resulted in substantially increased hand hygiene behaviors and resources in usual-care schools. Therefore these results should be viewed cautiously.