Introduction
Intimate partner
violence (IPV) is a serious public health concern that has not received an immense amount of attention in the
military community. It is well documented in
military literature that rates of IPV across US
military populations range from 13.5 % to 58 % , with considerably lower rates obtained among samples not selected on the basis of psychopathology (Marshall, Panuzio, & Taft, 2005). The main objectives are to address the this gap in literature concerning the definitions of
violence used, prevalence of IPV in
military intimate relationships, the nature and patterns of
violence, risk factors, and theories that may help to provide a better understanding of the
violence attached to this unique population.
Methods and theory
Civilian and military communities are urged to work towards using common definitions and practices to facilitate comparison of rates among the populations. Furthermore, methodological tools should move towards using more multi-method and longitudinal designs, more theoretical model applications and more diverse sample selection as strategies to further our understanding of the structure and inner workings of IPV in military couples.
Conclusion and recommendations
More exhaustive research, especially in Canada, including consistent definitions and methodology needs to be conducted. Also, future research needs to address the gap in the literature regarding theory application, risk factors associated with this phenomenon, and prevention methods.