Prognostic impact of diagnosing colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma using the World Health Organization 2010 classification

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jong Lyul Lee ; MD^a ; Chang Sik Yu ; MD ; PhD^a ; ^{csyu@amc.seoul.kr" class="auth_mail} ; Misung Kim ; MD^b ; Seung-Mo Hong ; MD ; PhD^b ; Seok-Byung Lim ; MD ; PhD^a ; Jin Cheon Kim ; MD ; PhD^a
• 刊名：Surgery
• 出版年：April, 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：155
• 期：4
• 页码：650-658
• 全文大小：2030 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) arising in the large intestine are rare neoplasms with highly aggressive behavior. The aim of the study was to compare the 2000 and 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of these colorectal NECs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with colorectal NECs according to the WHO 2000 classification who underwent surgery at the Asan Medical Center between May 2000 and December 2010. The data were reevaluated to assess their consistency with the WHO 2010 classification.

Results

For 20 of the 34 patients (59%), the 2000 and 2010 WHO classifications yielded the same NEC diagnosis (NEC group), whereas for 14 of the 34 patients (41%), the WHO 2010 classification mandated a diagnosis of G1 or G2 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) rather than NECs (G1/G2 NET group). The NEC group was older than the G1/G2 NET group (64 vs 55 years; P聽=聽.05). Tumor differentiation in the NEC group was poorer than in the G1/G2 NET group (percentage of poorly differentiated tumor, 70% vs 7%; P聽<聽.001). In both groups based on the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, most of the tumors were advanced at the time of diagnosis, reaching stage IIIB (6 NEC vs 10 NET) and stage IV (10 NEC vs 3 NET). The 5-year overall survival in the 2 groups was different (P聽=聽.02), but not the 5-year disease-free survival (P聽=聽.24).

Conclusion

These results indicate that the WHO 2010 classification of colorectal NEC is more accurate and has better prognostic value than the WHO 2000 classification.