Environmental comparison of two alternative road pavement rehabilitation techniques: cold-in-place-recycling versus traditional reconstruction
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Janez Turka ; janez.turk@zag.si" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Alenka Mauko Pranjića ; alenka.mauko@zag.si" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Ana Mladenoviča ; ana.mladenovic@zag.si" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Zvonko Cotičb ; zvonko.cotic@structum.si" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Primož Jurjavčičb ; primoz.jurjavcic@structum.si" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author
- 关键词：LCA ; Road reconstruction ; Cold in place recycling ; Sensitivity analysis
- 刊名：Journal of Cleaner Production
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：10 May 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：121
- 期：Complete
- 页码：45-55
- 全文大小：1846 K
文摘
- •
Environmental benefit of recycling versus conventional scenario was confirmed.
- •
However, carbon footprints of two compared scenarios are similar.
- •
Recycling scenario is very sensitive to the type of Portland cement.