Assessment of Long-Term Bowel Symptoms After Segmental Resection of Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Matched Cohort Study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Enrique Soto ; MD ; MSc^a ; ^b ; ^c ; Michelle Catenacci ; MD^a ; ^d ; Carrie Bedient ; MD^a ; ^e ; ^f ; J. Eric Jelovsek ; MD ; MMEd^a ; Tommaso Falcone ; MD^a ; ^{falcont@ccf.org" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Constipation ; Deep infiltrating endometriosis ; Fecal incontinence ; Segmental bowel resection ; Severe endometriosis
• 刊名：Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：July-August 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：23
• 期：5
• 页码：753-759
• 全文大小：442 K

文摘

To assess long-term bowel symptoms in women who underwent segmental bowel resection for deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) compared with women who underwent resection of severe endometriosis without bowel resection.

Design

Cohort study with matched controls (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting

Cleveland Clinic.

Patients

71 patients (36 cases and 35 controls).

Interventions

Patients who were at least 4 years out from undergoing segmental bowel resection due to DIE were matched with patients who had undergone resection of stage III/IV endometriosis without bowel resection. The patients completed validated questionnaires, and data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum, χ², and Fisher exact tests.

Measurements and Main Results

The Bristol Stool Form Scale, Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM), and St Mark's Vaizey Fecal Incontinence Grading System were used to elicit information. The median duration of follow-up was 10.1 years (range, 4–18 years). The mean patient age and body mass index were comparable in the cases and the controls. A larger proportion of cases than controls reported new bowel symptoms (58% [21 of 36] vs 14% [5 of 35]; p = .001), as well as abdominal pain, incomplete bowel movements, and false alarms on the PAC-SYM questionnaire; however, total PAC-SYM and Vaizey Fecal Incontinence Grading System scores were similar in the 2 groups (median, 8 [interquartile range, 8–10] vs 8 [8–10]; p = .86). Similarly, the proportion of patients with normal stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale score 2–6) was similar in the 2 groups (80.6% [29 of 36] vs 94.3% [33 of 35]; p = .59).

Conclusion

Segmental bowel resection for DIE may be associated with a higher incidence of new bowel symptoms (possibly due to abdominal pain, incomplete bowel movements, and/or false alarms), but not with worse constipation or fecal incontinence, compared with surgery without bowel resection.