The Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Online Credit Nutrition Courses: A Systematic Review
详细信息    查看全文
文摘

lass=""h4"">Objective

To assess how postsecondary online nutrition education courses (ONEC) are delivered, determine ONEC effectiveness, identify theoretical models used, and identify future research needs.

lass=""h4"">Design

Systematic search of database literature.

lass=""h4"">Setting

Postsecondary education.

lass=""h4"">Participants

Nine research articles evaluating postsecondary ONEC.

lass=""h4"">Main Outcome Measures

Knowledge/performance outcomes and student satisfaction, motivation, or perceptions.

lass=""h4"">Analysis

Systematic search of 922 articles and review of 9 articles meeting search criteria.

lass=""h4"">Results

Little research regarding ONEC marketing/management existed. Studies primarily evaluated introductory courses using email/websites (before 2000), or course management systems (after 2002). None used true experimental designs; just 3 addressed validity or reliability of measures or pilot-tested instruments. Three articles used theoretical models in course design; few used theories to guide evaluations. Four quasi-experimental studies indicated no differences in nutrition knowledge/performance between online and face-to-face learners. Results were inconclusive regarding student satisfaction, motivation, or perceptions.

lass=""h4"">Conclusions and Implications

Students can gain knowledge in online as well as in face-to-face nutrition courses, but satisfaction was mixed. More up-to-date investigations on effective practices are warranted, using theories to identify factors that enhance student outcomes, addressing emerging technologies, and documenting ONEC marketing, management, and delivery. Adequate training/support for faculty is needed to improve student experiences and faculty time management.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700