Low-dose intradermal versus intramuscular trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine in lung transplant recipients
详细信息    查看全文
文摘

Background

In this study we compared the immunogenicity of influenza vaccine administered intradermally to the standard intramuscular vaccination in lung transplant recipients.

Methods

Patients were randomized to receive the trivalent inactivated seasonal 2008–9 influenza vaccine containing either 6 μg (intradermal) or 15 μg (intramuscular) of hemagglutinin per viral strain. Immunogenicity was assessed by measurement of geometric mean titer of antibodies using the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assay. Vaccine response was defined as a 4-fold or higher increase of antibody titers to at least one vaccine antigen.

Results

Eighty-five patients received either the intradermal (n = 41) or intramuscular (n = 44) vaccine. Vaccine response was seen in 6 of 41 patients (14.6 % ) in the intradermal vs 8 of 43 (18.6 % ) in the intramuscular group (p = 0.77). Seroprotection (HI ≥1:32) was 39 % for H1N1, 83 % for H3N2 and 29 % for B strain in the intradermal group vs 28 % for H1N1, 98 % for H3N2 and 58 % for B strain in the intramuscular group (p = 0.36 for H1N1, p = 0.02 for H3N2, p < 0.01 for B). Mild adverse events were seen in 44 % of patients in the intradermal group and 34 % in the intramuscular group (p = 0.38).

Conclusions

Immunogenicity of the 2008–9 influenza vaccine given intradermally or intramuscularly was overall poor in lung transplant recipients. Novel strategies for influenza vaccination in this population are needed.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700