Endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm confers an early survival benefit over open repair
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

Despite the intuitive advantages of endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), uncertainty remains about the optimal management in the absence of convincing high-quality evidence. Our objective was to undertake a comprehensive literature review and perform a meta-analysis of outcome data of treatment modalities for ruptured AAAs.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted of electronic information sources to identify studies comparing perioperative outcomes of EVAR and open repair for AAA rupture. Summary estimates of odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained with a random-effects model. Meta-regression models were formed to explore potential heterogeneity as a result of changes in practice over time.

Results

We selected 41 studies for analysis. The entire meta-analysis population comprised 59,941 patients (8201 EVAR patients and 51,740 open repair patients). EVAR was associated with a significantly lower incidence of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.56; 95 % CI, 0.50-0.64; P?< .01; meta-analysis of risk-adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials: OR, 0.58; 95 % CI, 0.46-0.73; P?< .01). EVAR patients had a significantly decreased risk of developing respiratory complications (OR, 0.59; 95 % CI, 0.49-0.69; P?< .01) and acute renal failure (OR, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.55-0.78; P?< .01) and a trend toward a reduced incidence of cardiac complications (OR,??0.02; 95 % CI,??0.03 to 0.00; P?= .05) and mesenteric ischemia (OR, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.44-1.00; P?= .05). Patients treated with EVAR had significantly less?requirements of intraoperative blood transfusion (standardized mean difference,??0.88; 95 % CI,??1.06 to??0.70; P?< .01). Random-effects meta-regression revealed no statistical evidence for an association between death and year of?publication (P?= .19).

Conclusions

Our analysis provides evidence to motivate the adoption of an EVAR-first policy in a nonelective setting and the establishment of standardized protocols for the management ruptured AAAs.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700