Failure load of acrylic resin denture teeth bonded to high impact acrylic resins^{, , , , ,}

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Donna Barpal ; Donald A. Curtis ; Frederick Finzen ; Jovin Perry ; Stuart A. Gansky
• 关键词：AA ; Arachidonic acid ; ACE ; Antigen capture enzyme immunoassay ; ADP ; Adenosine diphosphate ; AGT ; Acquired Glanzmann's thrombasthenia ; DAT ; Direct anti-globulin test ; MoAb ; Monoclonal antibodies ; PTLPD ; Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder
• 刊名：The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
• 出版年：1998
• 出版时间：December 1998
• 年：1998
• 卷：80
• 期：6
• 页码：666-671
• 全文大小：59 K

文摘

Statement of problem. Techniques for bonding denture teeth to an acrylic resin denture base remain empirical, with little consensus from the literature, among clinicians, or among dental laboratories. Purpose. This study evaluated the failure load of acrylic resin teeth bonded to 2 high impact acrylic resins. Methods and material. The ridge lap portion on 120 identical denture teeth were modified with 3 variables: (1) placing a diatoric, (2) using monomer to prewet the denture tooth, and (3) breaking the glaze. Variables were combined to form 6 groups of 10 teeth each, and processed with Lucitone 199 (Lucitone) or SR-Ivocap (Ivocap) acrylic resin. Data analysis included the use of a heterogeneous variance linear regression model. Results. Mean (± SD) failure load ranged between 10.25 ± 1.48 Kg to 28.43 ± 11.05 Kg for the 6 Ivocap groups and 16.63 ± 5.87 Kg to 28.05 ± 5.35 Kg for the Lucitone groups. For Lucitone 199 acrylic resin, the highest failure loads resulted when the ridge lap was left with an intact glaze and did not have a diatoric, with no significant influence from the use of monomer. For Ivocap resin, the highest failure loads resulted when the ridge lap had a diatoric but did not have monomer placed, with no significant influence from glaze. Conclusion. Failure load of bonding highly cross-linked denture teeth to SR-Ivocap or Lucitone 199 acrylic resin was significantly influenced by modifications to the ridge lap before processing. (J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:666-71.)