Eligible participants were randomised to receive either CHM or placebo over 12 weeks, with a one month follow-up. Each subject attended a total of six clinic visits. Study participants and investigators were both blinded to the block randomisation number code until the statistical analyses were completed. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) Index was used as the primary outcome variable. Safety monitoring was conducted throughout the study.
47 participants were recruited into the study. The study had a 62% power to detect a significant difference in the primary outcome variable. Within-group analyses indicated significant improvements (p < 0.05) in terms of change of the WOMAC indices of pain, physical activity and total score in both groups, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the groups. The effectiveness of the CHM formula was maintained in the follow-up period but not in the placebo group. Safety data indicated the CHM was safe and well tolerated.
There is some limited indication of a therapeutic effect for the CHM. Larger scale studies over a longer time period are required.
This article belongs to the Special Issue: 鈥業G000020鈥?