Estimation of Left Ventricular Chamber and Stroke Volume by Limited M-Mode Echocardiography and Validation by Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：de Simone ; Giovanni ; Devereux ; Richard B. ; Ganau ; Antonello ; Hahn ; Rebecca T. ; Saba ; Pier Sergio ; et. al.
- 刊名：The American Journal of Cardiology
- 出版年：1996
- 出版时间：October 1, 1996
- 年：1996
- 卷：78
- 期：7
- 页码：801-807
- 全文大小：554 K
文摘
This study has been designed to improve estimation of stroke volume from linear left ventricular (LV) dimensions measured by M-mode echocardiography, in symmetrically contracting ventricles. In experimental studies, the ratio of LV epicardial long/short axes “Z” is about 1.3. We measured systolic and diastolic epicardial long and short axes by 2-dimensional echocardiography in 115 adults with widely varying LV short-axis dimensions (LV end-diastolic dimension = 3.95 to 8.3 cm). In a learning series of 23 normotensive and 27 hypertensive subjects, Zdiastole was 1.3 ± 0.1 and Zsystole = 1.2 ± 0.1, similar to findings in experimental animals. Regression equations were developed by comparing LV volumes by M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiography. In a test series (65 subjects), LV volumes were calculated using separate regression equations for end-diastolic volume ([LV end-diastolic dimension]24.765 − 0.288 × posterior wall thickness]) and for end-systolic volume ([LV end-systolic dimension]2[4.136 − 0.288 × posterior wall thickness]). Because the term 0.288 × wall thickness was only about 8 % of the first term between brackets, the average wall thickness in the learning series was substituted in the Z-volume formulas applied to the test series: end-diastolic volume = (4.5 × [LV end-diastolic dimensions]2) and end-systolic volume = (3.72 × [LV end-diastolic dimension]2). The mean relative error produced with this simplified method was 0.9 % in diastole and 1.4 % in systole. Compared with Teichholz' M-mode volume method, Z-derived end-diastolic volume in the test series was equally well related to 2-dimensional volumes (both r = 0.88), with a better intercept (1.5 vs −23 ml, p <0.001) and a slope closer to the identity line (1.1 vs 1.4). Similar results were found for systolic volumes. In a second test series of 1,721 American Indian participants in the Strong Heart Study without mitral regurgitation or segmental LV wall motion abnormalities, Doppler-derived LV stroke volume (70 ± 14 ml/beat) was similarly predicted by the Z-derived method (r = 0.65, 70 ± 11 ml/beat) and Teichholz formulas (r = 0.64, 72 ± 13 ml/beat), but Z-derived volumes had a regression line significantly closer to the identity line (p <0.005). Thus, LV chamber and stroke volumes can be determined from M-mode LV diameters over a wide range of LV sizes and in epidemiologic as well as clinical populations. The performance of this new method appears better than that obtained using the Teichholz formula, with a formula that is easy to handle and makes calculation of LV volumes by pocket calculator possible, even from limited echocardiographic studies.