Comparison of Prandtl-Ishlinskiı˘ and Preisach modeling for smart devices applications

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Mohammad Al Janaideh^a ; ^b ; Daniele Davino^c ; ^{davino@unisannio.it" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Pavel Krejčí ; ^d ; Ciro Visone^c
• 关键词：Hysteresis modeling ; Smart materials
• 刊名：Physica B: Physics of Condensed Matter
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：1 April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：486
• 期：Complete
• 页码：155-159
• 全文大小：911 K

文摘

Hysteresis of smart devices should be modeled in order to improve the performances and to relieve the control system tasks. Prandtl–Ishlinskiı˘ (PI) and Generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskiı˘ (GPI) hysteresis operators are popular because of their easiness of implementation and of the availability of inverse closed formulas. Nevertheless, PI and GPI are a subset of Preisach model (PM). Therefore, in principle, they are limited in representing hysteretic behaviors with respect to PM. In this paper, a first attempt to study the representation error of GPI with respect to general Preisach hysteretic behavior is presented and evaluated through two numerical experiments.