Bone cement allocation analysis in artificial cancellous bone structures

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ivan Zderic^a ; ^{ivan.zderic@aofoundation.org} ; Philipp Steinmetz^a ; Lorin M. Benneker^b ; Christoph Sprecher^a ; Oliver Rö ; hrle^c ; Markus Windolf^a ; Andreas Boger^d ; Boyko Gueorguiev^a
• 关键词：bone cement leakage ; flow behaviour ; foam model ; preoperative planning ; vertebroplasty
• 刊名：Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：8
• 期：Complete
• 页码：40-48
• 全文大小：2844 K
• 卷排序：8

文摘

One of the most serious adverse events potentially occurring during vertebroplasty is cement leakage. Associated risks for the patient could be reduced if cement filling is preoperatively planned. This requires a better understanding of cement flow behaviour. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate bone cement distribution in artificial inhomogeneous cancellous bone structures during a simulated stepwise injection procedure.MethodsFour differently coloured 1-mL cement portions were injected stepwise into six open-porous aluminum foam models with simulated leakage paths. Each model was subsequently cross-sectioned and high-resolution pictures were taken, followed by anatomical site allocation based on the assumption about a posterior insertion of the cannula. A radial grid consisting of 36 equidistant beams (0°–350°) was applied to evaluate the cement flow along each beam by measuring the radial length of each cement portion (total length) and of all four portions together (distance to border). Independently from the injection measurements, the viscosity of 20 cement portions was measured at time points corresponding to the start of the first and the end of the last injection.ResultsDespite some diffuse colour transitions at the borderlines, no interfusion between the differently coloured cement portions was observed. The two highest values for total length of each of the first three injected cement portions and for distance to border were indicated in directions anterior bilateral to the cannula along the 120°, 240° and 250° beams and posterolateral along the 60° beam. The two highest total lengths for the fourth cement portion were registered in the direction of the cannula along the 170° and 180° beams. Standard deviations of total length for each of the last three injected portions and for distance to border were with two highest values in directions anterior bilateral to the cannula along the 120°, 150°, 240° and 250° beams and opposite to the direction of the cannula along the 10° beam. The two highest values for the first cement portion were registered posterior bilateral to the cannula along the 70° and 350° beams. The values for averaged standard deviations of the total length of the fourth cement portion and the distance to border were significantly higher in comparison to the first cement portion (p ≤ 0.020). Dynamic viscosity at the start of the first injection was 343 ± 108 Pa∙s and increased to 659 ± 208 Pa∙s at the end of the fourth injection.ConclusionThe simulated leakage path seemed to be the most important adverse injection factor influencing the uniformity of cement distribution. Another adverse factor causing dispersion of this distribution was represented by the simulated bone marrow. However, the rather uniform distribution of the totally injected cement amount, considered as one unit, could be ascribed to the medium viscosity of the used cement. Finally, with its short waiting time of 45 s, the stepwise injection procedure was shown to be ineffective in preventing cement leakage.