Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Shanjun Tana ; Guohao Wua ; wuguohaozs@163.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Qiulin Zhuanga ; Qiulei Xia ; Qingyang Menga ; Yi Jianga ; Yusong Hana ; Chao Yub ; Zhen Yuc ; Ning Lid
- 关键词：Laparoscopic repair ; Peptic ulcer ; Meta-analysis
- 刊名：International Journal of Surgery
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：September 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：33
- 期：part_PA
- 页码：124-132
- 全文大小：2311 K
文摘
- •
Laparoscopic surgery is comparable with open procedure in the setting of repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
- •
The advantages of laparoscopic surgery are lower surgical site infection rate, shorter nasogastric tube duration, and less postoperative pain.
- •
More higher quality RCTs are still needed to further confirm this conclusion.