National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality recommendations: first report

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Maurice Ohayon ; MD ; DSc ; PhD^a ; ^{research@sleepfoundation.org} ; Emerson M. Wickwire ; PhD^b ; ^c ; Max Hirshkowitz ; PhD^d ; ^e ; Steven M. Albert ; PhD ; MS^f ; Alon Avidan ; MD ; MPH^g ; Frank J. Daly ; PhD^h ; Yves Dauvilliers ; MD ; PhDⁱ ; Raffaele Ferri ; MD^j ; Constance Fung ; MD ; MSHS^k ; David Gozal ; MD^l ; Nancy Hazen ; PhD^m ; Andrew Krystal ; MDⁿ ; Kenneth Lichstein ; PhD^o ; Monica Mallampalli ; PhD ; MSC^p ; Giuseppe Plazzi ; MD^q ; ^r ; Robert Rawding ; PhD^s ; Frank A. Scheer ; PhD^t ; Virend Somers ; MD ; PhD^u ; Michael V. Vitiello ; PhD^v
• 关键词：Sleep quality ; Sleep efficiency ; Sleep architecture ; Aging
• 刊名：Sleep Health
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：3
• 期：1
• 页码：6-19
• 全文大小：2926 K
• 卷排序：3

文摘

To provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance to the public regarding indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span.MethodsThe National Sleep Foundation assembled a panel of experts from the sleep community and representatives appointed by stakeholder organizations (Sleep Quality Consensus Panel). A systematic literature review identified  277 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Abstracts and full-text articles were provided to the panelists for review and discussion. A modified Delphi RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 3 rounds of voting was used to determine agreement.ResultsFor most of the sleep continuity variables (sleep latency, number of awakenings >5 minutes, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency), the panel members agreed that these measures were appropriate indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span. However, overall, there was less or no consensus regarding sleep architecture or nap-related variables as elements of good sleep quality.ConclusionsThere is consensus among experts regarding some indicators of sleep quality among otherwise healthy individuals. Education and public health initiatives regarding good sleep quality will require sustained and collaborative efforts from multiple stakeholders. Future research should explore how sleep architecture and naps relate to sleep quality. Implications and limitations of the consensus recommendations are discussed.