We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 23 self-identified integrative medical practitioners in two states of Australia. Participants were recruited from publicly available lists of self-identified integrative medical practitioners - the local telephone listing and the website of their professional organisation. Interviews explored how doctors define and use evidence in their practice. We undertook a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts with particular exploration of the key ideas that emerged about their use of evidence.
These practitioners are sceptical about the dominance of the evidence-based medicine movement, and push to reclaim their autonomy based on the indeterminancy of individual cases. They acknowledge that an understanding of clinical benefit may not be scientifically evidenced and utilise discourses of experience and safety in discussing their clinical practice.
Our findings provide further insights into how medical practitioners work within their own profession, their relationships with other care providers (specifically CAM practitioners), their views about their non-integrative medical peers and their resistance to prescribed ways of clinical practice.