Comparative study on two low-grade heat driven absorption-compression refrigeration cycles based on energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Two absorption-compression cycles (EC and ES) are compared based on 4E analyses. EC saves 22.5% more electricity but has 23.5% lower COPg and 35.1% lower ηexηex. The better cycle is obtained for different electricity price and CO2 tax rate. Components with best potential to improve exergy and economy performance are given.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700