Current practice in regional anaesthesia in South America: An online survey

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：M.A. Corvetto^a ; J. Carmona^a ; M.I. Vá ; squez^b ; C. Salgueiro^c ; J. Crostó ; n^d ; R. Sosa^e ; V. Folle^f ; F.R. Altermatt^a ; ^{fernando.altermatt@gmail.com}
• 关键词：Anaesthesia ; Regional anaesthesia ; Peripheral nerve block ; Survey
• 刊名：Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition)
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：64
• 期：1
• 页码：27-31
• 全文大小：669 K
• 卷排序：64

文摘

A survey was conducted in order to obtain a profile of the practice of regional anaesthesia in South America, and determine the limitations of its use.MethodsAfter institutional ethics committee approval, a link to an online questionnaire was sent by e-mail to anaesthesiologists in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Panamá, Paraguay, Perú, and Uruguay. The questionnaire was processed anonymously.ResultsA total of 1260 completed questionnaires were received. The results showed that 97.6% of the anaesthesiologists that responded used regional anaesthesia in clinical practice, 66.9% performed peripheral nerve block (PNB) regularly, 21.6% used continuous PNB techniques, and 4.6% used stimulating catheters. The primary source of training was residency programmes. As regards PNB, the most common performed were interscalene (52.3%), axillary (45.1%), femoral (43.2%), and ankle block (43%). As regards the localisation technique employed, 16% used paraesthesia, 44.2% used a peripheral nerve stimulator, and 18.1% ultrasound guidance.ConclusionsRegional anaesthesia and PNB are commonly used among South American anaesthesiologists. Considering that each country has its own profile for use, this profile should guide training in clinical practice, especially in residency programmes.