A split-mouth design was used with random allocation of sham and experimental sites in 12 rabbits. In experimental sites, either HemCon or 15.5% ferric sulfate was applied to osseous crypts created with a round bur. Hemostatic efficacy was evaluated using predetermined scores. Rabbits were sacrificed at 21 days, and tissues were harvested and prepared for histologic evaluation. A blinded pathologist scored samples relative to inflammation. The percentage of new bone deposition was calculated using NIS Elements software (Nikon Instruments Inc, Melville, NY).
There was no statistical significant difference in hemostatic efficacy or wound healing between HemCon and ferric sulfate (P > .05). The HemCon group showed a significantly higher percentage of new bone deposition compared with the controls (P < .01).
HemCon shows promise as an adjunct to the endodontic surgical armamentarium.