Reasons for missed appointments with a hepatitis C outreach clinic: A qualitative study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ray Poll^a ; ^{ray.poll@sth.nhs.uk} ; Peter Allmark^b ; Angela M. Tod^c ; ¹
• 关键词：Hepatitis C ; Missed appointments ; Reasons ; Outreach ; Drug use ; Telephone interviews
• 刊名：International Journal of Drug Policy
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：39
• 期：Complete
• 页码：130-137
• 全文大小：294 K
• 卷排序：39

文摘

Non-attendance in drug service hepatitis C outreach clinics means clients miss the opportunity of being given lifestyle advice and referral to hospital for assessment and treatment. A similar problem is experienced in other services throughout the UK. A qualitative study was undertaken to investigate the problem.MethodsClients with a history of not attending the outreach clinic were invited to participate during a routine drug clinic appointment. A contact details sheet with a preferred telephone number was completed by those agreeing to take part. Verbal consent was taken and a telephone interview took place. The participants were remunerated for taking part with a five pounds high street voucher. The ‘framework method’ was used to analyse the data with key themes identified.ResultsTwenty-eight telephone interviews were undertaken from April to June 2012. All the clients gave ‘prima-facie’ reasons for non-attendance including ‘not a priority’ and ‘forgot’. However, the study indicates these are insufficient to explain the various experiences and influences. Underlying reasons that impacted upon attendance were identified. These reasons relate to (i) client characteristics e.g. ‘priority’ to score drugs and the ‘cost of travel’ and (ii) clinic service e.g. ‘difficult journey’ to the clinic and timing of the ‘appointment’. The reasons operated within a complex context where other factors had an impact including addiction, welfare policy, stigma and the nature of hepatitis C itself.ConclusionThe study revealed that beneath apparently simple explanations for non-attendance, such as clients’ chaotic lifestyle resulting in them forgetting or not being bothered to attend, there were far more complex and varied underlying reasons. This has important implications for drug policy including the need to better incorporate clients’ perspectives. Policy that is based only on the simple, surface reasons is unlikely to be effective.