Assessment of pan-sharpening methods applied to image fusion of remotely sensed multi-band data

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yuhendra^a ; ^b ; ^{Yuhendra_st@yahoo.com} ; Ilham Alimuddin^a ; ^c ; Josaphat Tetuko Sri Sumantyo^a ; Hiroaki Kuze^a
• 关键词：Pan-sharpening ; Fusion methods ; SVM ; Image quality ; Noised-based metric
• 刊名：International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：August, 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：18
• 期：Complete
• 页码：165-175
• 全文大小：2568 K

文摘

Image fusion is a useful tool for integrating a high resolution panchromatic image (PI) with a low resolution multispectral image (MIs) to produce a high resolution multispectral image for better understanding of the observed earth surface. Various methods proposed for pan-sharpening satellite images are examined from the viewpoint of accuracies with which the color information and spatial context of the original image are reproduced in the fused product image. In this study, methods such as Gram-Schmidt (GS), Ehler, modified intensity-hue-saturation (M-IHS), high pass filter (HPF), and wavelet-principal component analysis (W-PCA) are compared. The quality assessment of the products using these different methods is implemented by means of noise-based metrics. In order to test the robustness of the image quality, Poisson noise, motion blur, or Gaussian blur is intentionally added to the fused image, and the signal-to-noise and related statistical parameters are evaluated and compared among the fusion methods. And to achieve the assessed accurate classification process, we proposed a support vector machine (SVM) based on radial basis function kernel. By testing five methods with WorldView2 data, it is found that the Ehler method shows a better result for spatial details and color reproduction than GS, M-IHS, HPF and W-PCA. For QuickBird data, it is found that all fusion methods reproduce both color and spatial information close to the original image. Concerning the robustness against the noise, the Ehler method shows a good performance, whereas the W-PCA approach occasionally leads to similar or slightly better results. Comparing the performance of various fusion methods, it is shown that the Ehler method yields the best accuracy, followed by the W-PCA. The producer's and user's accuracies of the Ehler method are 89.94 % and 90.34 % , respectively, followed by 88.14 % and 88.26 % of the W-PCA method.