- 作者：Martin Loucka ; Sheila Payne ; Sarah Brearley ; EURO IMPACT
- 关键词：International comparison ; provision ; methodology ; quality of care ; reporting ; hospice care
- 刊名：Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- 出版年：January, 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：47
- 期：1
- 页码：154-165
- 全文大小：356 K
Context
A number of research projects have been conducted that aim to gather data on the international development of palliative care. These data are important for policy makers and palliative care advocates.Objectives
The aim of this article was to provide a critical comparative analysis of methodological approaches used to assess the development and status of palliative care services and infrastructure at an international level.
Methods
A selective literature review that focused on the methodological features of eight identified reports was undertaken.
Results
Reviewed reports were found to differ in adopted methodologies and provided uneven amounts of methodological information. Five major methodological limitations were identified (lack of theory, use of experts as source of information, grey literature, difficulties in ranking, and the problematic nature of data on service provision). A set of recommendations on how to deal with these issues in future research is provided.
Conclusion
Measuring the international development of palliative care is a difficult and challenging task. The results of this study could be used to improve the validity of future research in this field.