Endometrial Ablation in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Related to Ovulatory Dysfunction: A Cohort Study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Alexis N. Hokenstad ; MD ; Sherif A. El-Nashar ; MBBCh ; Zaraq Khan ; MBBS ; Matthew R. Hopkins ; MD ; Abimbola O. Famuyide ; MBBS ; ^{famuyide.abimbola@mayo.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Abnormal uterine bleeding ; Endometrial ablation ; Irregular bleeding
• 刊名：Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：November-December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：22
• 期：7
• 页码：1225-1230
• 全文大小：530 K

文摘

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endometrial ablation (EA) for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) associated with ovulatory dysfunction.

Design

A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting

An academic medical center.

Patients

Women with AUB who underwent EA during an 8-year period.

Interventions

EA by radiofrequency or thermal balloon ablation techniques.

Measurements and Main Results

Women with AUB were divided into 2 groups: irregular bleeding with ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O) or regular heavy bleeding related to a primary endometrial disorder (AUB-E). Outcome measures included rates of amenorrhea and treatment failure (ie, need for reablation or hysterectomy). Outcomes were compared between groups using survival analyses and chi-square tests. Known confounders were adjusted for using Cox and logistic regression models. Five-year cumulative treatment failure rates were 11.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5%–16.9%) for AUB-O and 12.3% (95% CI, 8.4%–16.2%) for AUB-E (p = .62). The unadjusted hazard ratio for treatment failure was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.72–1.05, p = .16). After adjusting for known risk factors for failure, the hazard ratio was 1.48 (95% CI, 0.82–2.65, p = .19). The rates of amenorrhea were 11.8% for AUB-O and 13.8% for AUB-E with an unadjusted odds ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.48–1.48, p = .55). After adjusting for factors for amenorrhea after EA, the odds ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.62–1.84, p =.78). No pregnancies or endometrial cancers occurred after EA.

Conclusion

EA is effective in women with AUB-O and can be used as an alternative to hysterectomy or in patients with contraindications to medical management of AUB-O.