Resistance Training Dose Response in Combined Endurance-Resistance Training in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomized Trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Robert Berent ; MD^a ; Serge P. von Duvillard ; PhD ; FACSM ; FECSS^b ; ^{serge.duvillard@sbg.ac.at" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Stephen F. Crouse ; PhD^c ; Helmut Sinzinger ; MD^d ; John S. Green ; PhD^c ; Peter Schmid ; MD^a
• 关键词：Rehabilitation ; Resistance training
• 刊名：Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：October 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：92
• 期：10
• 页码：1527-1533
• 全文大小：625 K

文摘

Berent R, von Duvillard SP, Crouse SF, Sinzinger H, Green JS, Schmid P. Resistance training dose response in combined endurance-resistance training in patients with cardiovascular disease: a randomized trial.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of 2 different volumes of resistance training (RT) combined with aerobic training in residential cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Design

Randomized prospective cohort study.

Setting

Center for inpatient CR.

Participants

Patients (N=295) with a mean age ± SD of 62.7±11.7 years participated in the study.

Interventions

Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (group 1 and group 2) with different volumes of RT; 2 sets × 12 repetitions (REPS) (group 1) and 3 sets × 15 REPS (group 2) per session, 2 times per week; each RT session consisting of 10 different resistance exercises. In addition, patients also completed continuous moderate intensity aerobic training composed of cycle ergometry 6 times per week for 17±4 minutes (mean ± SD) and walking 5 times per week for 45 minutes.

Main Outcome Measures

At entry and after 26±4 (mean ± SD) days of CR, blood pressure, heart rate, maximal oxygen consumption, and maximal power determined during cycle ergometry, strength determined via RT, and blood biochemistries were assessed. Data were analyzed via a 2-way (group × time) repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed equivalent improvements in exercise capacity, muscular strength, hemodynamics, and blood chemistries regardless of RT volume (comparison-wise type I error rate, α<.01).

Conclusions

Our results show that nearly doubling (3 sets × 15 REPS vs 2 sets × 12 REPS) the volume of RT as part of a residential CR program does not yield further improvement in strength and cardiovascular risk factors.