Rethinking anaesthesia strategies for patients with traumatic eye injuries: Alternatives to general anaesthesia
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Regional anaesthesia has traditionally been considered to be contraindicated in patients with traumatic eye injuries, in part owing to the potential to extrude intraocular contents via force generated by local anaesthetics. Needle instrumentation of the orbit, squeezing of the eyelids, and pressure due to bleeding are additional reasons regional anaesthesia is typically avoided in open-globe scenarios. Nonetheless, anecdotal case reports and subsequent retrospective and prospective series of successful use of ophthalmic blocks in this setting have been published. In an 8-year period, over 450 traumatic eye injury cases were reviewed at the University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. A significant number of injuries were repaired under regional anaesthesia techniques. Successfully blocked eyes tended to have more anterior, smaller wounds than those repaired via general anaesthesia. There was no difference in outcome, defined as comparative change of visual acuity from initial evaluation until final examination, between the eyes repaired via regional vs. general anaesthesia. A prospective study of selected open-globe patients found similar results. Moreover, combined topical anaesthesia and sedation for selected patients with open-globe injuries has also been reported.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700