Stormwater quality improvement potential of an urbanised catchment using water sensitive retrofits into public parks

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Ramesh Raja Segaran ; ^{ramesh.rajasegaran@adelaide.edu.au" class="auth_mail} ; Megan Lewis ^{megan.lewis@adelaide.edu.au" class="auth_mail} ; Bertram Ostendorf ^{bertram.ostendorf@adelaide.edu.au" class="auth_mail}
• 关键词：Bioretention ; GIS ; Impervious surface areas ; Sustainable
• 刊名：Urban Forestry Urban Greening
• 出版年：2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：13
• 期：2
• 页码：315-324
• 全文大小：2479 K

文摘

Urban stormwater management is undergoing a transition from centralised hydrologically efficient systems to collections of dispersed, multi-functional elements. In response to a better understanding of impervious surface areas, the adoption of water sensitive urban design is promising for new large urban developments. However, spatial and economic constraints prohibit its adoption in established urban areas. We explore the potential for improvement to stormwater quality if 10% of existing parks in an established urban catchment are reserved for stormwater filtration. Spatially explicit hydrologic modelling is used to model the effects of parks in an existing urban catchment in South Australia as networks of bioretention devices. The allocation of 10% of parks that cover less than 16% of the landscape for bioretention devices may result in a 62% reduction (7.8 tonnes per year) of nitrogen from stormwater. The sources and destinations of stormwater pollutants are mapped to explore the strength and weaknesses of park size and distribution within each sub-catchment. Large parks situated lower in the catchment along the main trunk, and distributed smaller parks higher along the secondary stormwater network are shown to be effectively located. The potential for increasing the utilitarian value of many public parks by demonstrating the capacity for significantly improving urban stormwater quality is illustrated in this exploratory model. Opportunities for targeted improvements to stormwater quality are examined in the discussion.