Danger detection and escape behaviour in wood crickets

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Fabienne Dupuy¹ ; ^a ; ^{fyd20@cam.ac.uk"" rel=""nofollow} ; Jé ; rô ; me Casas^a ; Mé ; lanie Body^a ; Claudio R. Lazzari ; ^a ; ^{claudio.lazzari@univ-tours.fr"" rel=""nofollow}
• 关键词：Nemobius sylvestris ; Escape behaviour ; Mechanoreception
• 刊名：Journal of Insect Physiology
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：July 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：57
• 期：7
• 页码：865-871
• 全文大小：430 K

文摘

The wind-sensitive cercal system of Orthopteroid insects that mediates the detection of the approach of a predator is a very sensitive sensory system. It has been intensively analysed from a behavioural and neurobiological point of view, and constitutes a classical model system in neuroethology. The escape behaviour is triggered in orthopteroids by the detection of air-currents produced by approaching objects, allowing these insects to keep away from potential dangers. Nevertheless, escape behaviour has not been studied in terms of success. Moreover, an attacking predator is more than “air movement”, it is also a visible moving entity. The sensory basis of predator detection is thus probably more complex than the perception of air movement by the cerci. We have used a piston mimicking an attacking running predator for a quantitative evaluation of the escape behaviour of wood crickets Nemobius sylvestris. The movement of the piston not only generates air movement, but it can be seen by the insect and can touch it as a natural predator. This procedure allowed us to study the escape behaviour in terms of detection and also in terms of success. Our results showed that 5–52 % of crickets that detected the piston thrust were indeed touched. Crickets escaped to stimulation from behind better than to a stimulation from the front, even though they detected the approaching object similarly in both cases. After cerci ablation, 48 % crickets were still able to detect a piston approaching from behind (compared with 79 % of detection in intact insects) and 24 % crickets escaped successfully (compared with 62 % in the case of intact insects). So, cerci play a major role in the detection of an approaching object but other mechanoreceptors or sensory modalities are implicated in this detection. It is not possible to assure that other sensory modalities participate (in the case of intact animals) in the behaviour; rather, than in the absence of cerci other sensory modalities can partially mediate the behaviour. Nevertheless, neither antennae nor eyes seem to be used for detecting approaching objects, as their inactivation did not reduce their detection and escape abilities in the presence of cerci.