The sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique is a means to estimate CH
4 emissions from individual ruminants, particularly whilst grazing. The success of the SF
6 technique is reliant upon accurate de
termination of the release rate of SF
6 gas from the permeation tubes (PT). Our study aimed to determine effects of SF
6 PT rumen residence time on the release rate of SF
6 gas and calculated CH
4 production (as g CH
4/d) in grazing red deer. The CH
4 emissions of red deer stags grazing permanent perennial ryegrass based
pasture were estimated daily for 5 d at 4.5, 6.5, 9.0 and 11.5 months of age, corresponding to a PT release period of 55, 111, 195 and 258 d. Permeation tube charge time refers to the number of days since PT were charged with SF
6. The PT were recovered from 3 deer after the second CH
4 measurement and from the remaining 10 deer at the end of the experiment. Release rates of SF
6 gas from PT were determined pre-insertion to the rumen (i.e., uncorrected SF
6 release rates), or by pre-insertion SF
6 release rate with adjustment for SF
6 release rates from PT recovered at the
termination of the experiment (i.e., corrected SF
6 release rates), after the PT had resided in the rumen of red deer for 212 d. A difference of 12.8 % between corrected and uncorrected SF
6 release rates (P=0.07) occurred after 9 d of PT rumen residence. In contrast, after 65, 150 and 212 d of PT residence, corrected release rates were lower (P<0.05) than uncorrected SF
6 release rates by 16, 19.5 and 27 % , respectively. Calculated CH
4 production and yield (as g CH
4/kg dry matter intake) of deer was also reduced by up to 15 % (P<0.001) when calculated using corrected versus uncorrected SF
6 release rates. Results imply that use of uncorrected SF
6 release rates may not be representative of actual SF
6 release rate from PT whilst they reside in the rumen. Results also suggest that PT should be recovered upon completion of the experiment and SF
6 release rates estimated in order to improve accuracy of calculated CH
4 emissions.
This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture – Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson.