Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification between 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Purpose

To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between 2 microincision hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and with a conventional spherical hydrophobic IOL.

Setting

St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Design

Prospective randomized comparative study.

Methods

A microincision Acri.Smart 36A (negatively aspheric) or Akreos MI-60 (aspherically neutral) IOL was randomized to the first eye of patients with the alternative IOL implanted in the fellow eye within 3 weeks. Postoperatively, 100 % and 9 % logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were assessed. Retroillumination photographs were analyzed using the posterior capsule opacity software system. The data on PCO scores were compared with those of a conventional spherical hydrophobic IOL (Acrysof SN60AT).

Results

One hundred percent CDVA was significantly better at 12 months and 9 % CDVA was better at 6, 12, and 24 months (P<.05) with the negatively aspheric IOL. One eye in each group with microincision IOLs developed capsule phimosis at 1 month. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomies were required by 2 years in 2 eyes with a negatively aspheric IOL and 8 eyes with an aspherically neutral IOL. At 24 months, the mean PCO score remained less than 10 % with the conventional spherical IOL, whereas it increased with time in the negatively aspheric IOL (up to 16 % ) and the aspherically neutral IOL (up to 23 % ).

Conclusions

The negatively aspheric IOL had a better PCO profile than the aspherically neutral IOL. This may be attributed to the difference in the edge design between the IOLs. The microincision IOLs had more PCO than the conventional 1-piece hydrophobic IOL.

Financial Disclosure

Dr. Nanavaty was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Drs. Spalton and Boyce were consultants to Alcon Laboratories, Inc. at the?time of this study. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700