Comments on the papers recently published by Kalaivani et al.

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bikshandarkoil R. Srinivasan ; ^{srini@unigoa.ac.in" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Kedar U. Narvekar
• 关键词：A1. EDAX ; A1. Elemental composition ; A1. Dubious crystal ; B1. l-lysinium succinate ; B1. l- threonine phthalate ; B1. Sodium acetate doped l-tyrosine ; B1. zinc chloride doped l-lysinium succinate
• 刊名：Journal of Crystal Growth
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：15 April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：440
• 期：Complete
• 页码：110-112
• 全文大小：193 K

文摘

We argue that the so-called l-lysinium succinate 1 (Kalaivani et al. (2015) [16], zinc chloride doped l-lysinium succinate 2 (Kalaivani et al. (2015) [17], l-threonine phthalate 3 (Elberin Mary Theras et al. (2015) [18] and sodium acetate doped l-tyrosine 4 (Arthi et al. (2015) [19] are all dubious crystals. Taking compounds 1–4 as examples we show that EDAX is an inappropriate method for characterization of new materials based on elemental composition data.