Which “fairness”, for whom, and why? An empirical analysis of plural notions of fairness in Fairtrade Carbon Projects, using Q methodology
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Rebecca J. Howarda ; R.J.Howard12@leeds.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; joyfulbeeing@yahoo.fr" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Anne M. Tallontirea ; a.m.tallontire@leeds.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Lindsay C. Stringera ; L.Stringer@leeds.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Rob A. Marchantb ; robert.marchant@york.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author
- 关键词：Carbon credits ; Certification ; Fairtrade climate standard ; Multi-dimensional equity framework
- 刊名：Environmental Science & Policy
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：February 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：56
- 期：Complete
- 页码：100-109
- 全文大小：465 K
文摘
- •
Uses Q methodology to identify three factors on fairness in carbon projects.
- •
Links factors with contested fair trade and carbon processes and practices.
- •
Maps key fault lines in fair carbon debates onto theoretical dimensions of fairness.
- •
Signals need to make fairness definitions explicit when designing Fairtrade standards.