This was a retrospective cohort study of 312 patients who underwent vaginal surgery for prolapse from February 1998 to January 2004.
Of the 312 patients, 98 (31.4 % ) had graft augmentation. The median follow-up was 9 months (3-67 months). Graft use was not associated with reduction in recurrent prolapse, recurrent stage 3 prolapse, recurrent incontinence, or additional surgery for prolapse. After controlling for confounders, there was still no difference in surgical outcomes. Complications such as vaginal/graft infection (18.4 % vs 4.7 % ; P < .001) and granulation tissue (38.8 % vs 17.3 % ; P < .001) were more common after cases in which graft was used.
In the early postoperative period, there was no benefit in using graft for prolapse repair. Graft use leads to a higher rate of postoperative complications.