Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Acetabular Stabilization for Periacetabular Metastatic Disease with Thermal Ablation and Augmented Screw Fixation

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Michael P. Hartung ; MD^a ; Sean M. Tutton ; MD^a ; ^{stutton@mcw.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Eric J. Hohenwalter ; MD^a ; ^b ; David M. King ; MD^b ; John C. Neilson ; MD^b
• 关键词：MIAS ; minimally invasive acetabular stabilization ; MSTS ; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society ; PMMA ; polymethyl methacrylate
• 刊名：Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：May 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：27
• 期：5
• 页码：682-688.e1
• 全文大小：1364 K

文摘

To evaluate minimally invasive acetabular stabilization (MIAS) with thermal ablation and augmented screw fixation for impending or minimally displaced fractures of the acetabulum secondary to metastatic disease.

Materials and Methods

Between February 2011 and July 2014, 13 consecutive patients underwent thermal ablation, percutaneous screw fixation, and polymethyl methacrylate augmentation for impending or nondisplaced fractures of the acetabulum secondary to metastatic disease. Functional outcomes were evaluated before and after the procedure using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. Complications, hospital length of stay, and eligibility for chemotherapy and radiation therapy were assessed.

Results

All procedures were technically successful with no major periprocedural complications. The mean total MSTS score improved from 23% &plusmn; 11 before MIAS to 51% &plusmn; 21 after MIAS (m>Pm> < .05). The mean MSTS pain scores improved from 0% (all) to 32% &plusmn; 22 after MIAS (m>Pm> < .05). The mean MSTS walking ability score improved from 22% &plusmn; 19 to 55% &plusmn; 26 after MIAS (m>Pm> < .05). Two complications occurred; a patient had a minimally displaced fracture of the superior pubic ramus at the site of repair but remained ambulatory, and septic arthritis was diagnosed in another patient 12 months after repair. The average length of hospital stay was 2 days &plusmn; 3.6; six patients were discharged within 24 hours of the procedure. All patients were eligible for chemotherapy and radiation therapy immediately after the procedure.

Conclusions

MIAS is feasible, improves pain and mobility, and offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgical reconstruction.