Diagnostic validity of physical examination tests for common knee disorders: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Simon Dé ; cary^a ; ^b ; ^{simon.decary.1@umontreal.ca} ; Philippe Ouellet^a ; ^b ; ^{philippe.ouellet.3@umontreal.ca} ; Pascal-André ; Vendittoli^b ; ^c ; ^{pa_vendittoli@hotmail.com} ; Jean-Sé ; bastien Roy^d ; ^e ; ^{jean-sebastien.roy@fmed.ulaval.ca} ; Franç ; ois Desmeules^a ; ^b ; ^{f.desmeules@umontreal.ca}
• 关键词：SR ; Systematic-review ; MA ; Meta-analysis ; ACL ; Anterior cruciate ligament injuries ; PCL ; Posterior cruciate ligament injuries ; OA ; Osteoarthritis ; PFP ; Patellofemoral pain ; PRISMA ; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses ; Sn ; Sensitivity ; Sp ; Specificity ; PPV ; Positive predictive value ; NPV ; Negative predictive value ; LR ; Likelihood ratio ; DOR ; Diagnostic odds ratio ; AMSTAR ; Assessment of methodological quality of multiple systematic reviews
• 刊名：Physical Therapy in Sport
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：23
• 期：Complete
• 页码：143-155
• 全文大小：1016 K
• 卷排序：23

文摘

The Lachman is able to rule in or out an ACL injury. No other individual test is able to rule in or out a knee disorder. Based on limited evidence, complete physical examination may improve validity. Clinical prediction rules are required to enhance clinicians' diagnostic capacities.