Carbon footprint of a scientific publication: A case study at Dalian University of Technology, China
详细信息    查看全文
文摘

A survey combined with life-cycle assessment quantified the carbon footprint of a publication.

An average publication generated 5.44 kg CO2-equiv.

Reading efficiency, reference quantity, and proportion of e-reading dominated the emissions.

Substitution of desktops with laptops benefited the environment most in scenario analysis.

Comparing the emissions from e-reading and p-reading is inadvisable due to time variation and behavioral uncertainty.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700