Assessing the coding reliability of work accidents statistical data: How coders make a difference
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Celeste Jacintoa ; mcj@fct.unl.pt" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Fernando P. Santosb ; fernando.santos@centec.tecnico.ulisboa.pt" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Carlos Guedes Soaresb ; c.guedes.soares@centec.tecnico.ulisboa.pt" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Sí ; lvia A. Silvac ; silvia.silva@iscte.pt" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae
- 关键词：Accident data ; Content analysis ; Reliability coefficients ; Intercoder reliability ; ESAW variables
- 刊名：Journal of Safety Research
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：December 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：59
- 期：Complete
- 页码：9-21
- 全文大小：1117 K
文摘
- •
It assesses coding reliability of 8 ESAW variables (3 different groups of coders)
- •
The “expert group” (governmental coders) has 68-98% reliability (good to excellent)
- •
Reliability loss (-5 to -39%) occurs when coded by people without training/knowledge
- •
Variable “Economic Activity of Employer” holds the highest reliability agreement
- •
Some ESAW variables must improve quality of coding, e.g.: “Mat. Agent of Deviation”