The primary endpoint was SWALM6. For all 186 patients, a standard IMRT (parotid sparing) and a SW-IMRT plan (additional constraints for swallowing organs at risk) was created. The difference in NTCP for SWALM6 (ΔNTCPSWALM6 = NTCPstandard − NTCPSW-IMRT) was calculated. Patients were treated with SW-IMRT. The external validation of the NTCP model was analyzed by comparing performance measures.
The mean ΔNTCPSWALM6 was 4.9% (range 0.01–17.3%), with a significant lower mean predicted NTCPSW-IMRT of 22.6% (95% CI 20.2–24.9%), compared to NTCPstandard of 27.5% (95% CI 24.9–29.9%) (p < 0.001). There was a perfect correspondence of NTCPSW-IMRT with the observed prevalence of SWALM6 (22.6%). The overall model performance, discrimination and ‘goodness of fit’ were good.
We externally validated the multivariable NTCP model for SWALM6 in SW-IMRT treated patients, showing reduced swallowing dysfunction by reducing the dose parameters included in this NTCP model.